Construction professions applied for health and safety job reservation

Construction professional bodies have applied to the Competition Commission to reserve jobs, including health and safety job reservation.

Comment to the commission expired on 16 August 2013. The Council for the Build Environment (CBE), on behalf of construction health and safety managers currently registering with the SA Council for Project and Construction Management Professions (SACPCMP), as well as Landscape Architects, Property Valuers, Architects and Quality Surveyors, have applied for exemption from the Identification of Work (IDOW) rules in Chapter 2 of the Competition Act.

In terms of the Competition Act Chapter 2, a professional body must apply for exemption in order to create barriers of entry to a profession through registration.

The prohibition against job reservation, including health and safety job reservation and restrictive trade, applies to all bodies, not only statutory bodies such as SACPCMP, but also voluntary health and safety registrars, SAIOSH /IOSH SA, IOSM and SAIOH.

Exemption of SACPCMP, and thus reservation of certain work for registered people, may set a precedent for voluntary bodies to apply for exemption and thus enforcement of their designations on employers and health and safety practitioners.

However, only the top designation of each of the registrars involve a degree, and some practitioners have argued against attempted ‘professionalisation’ and health and safety job reservation for training, experience, and profesiosnal qualifications below tertiary level, as a costly diversion from training and development.

IDOW rules provide for reservation of work for registered professionals with a certain level of competency, and thus prevent non-registered people from performing certain categories of work.

Health and safety professionals not registered with the SACPCMP or construction professional councils, were invited to comment to the Competition Commission on whether the exemption should be granted. The notice was not circulated among health and safety practitioners.

Professional bodies jumped the gun

If the Construction Regulations Amendment of 2013 requires appointment of a client Agent with professional registration, and does not specify Health and Safety Agent, contractors may appoint managers, project managers, engineers, architects or other construction professionals as Agents.

Definitions in the text circulated two years ago, indicate that if a construction manager were appointed as Health and Safety Agent, then the safety practitioner need not be registered, if he or she were an employee of the Agent.

The draft regulations circulated last year, did not specify which SACPCMP category or designation the construction Health and Safety Agent would have to be registered in. There are six categories of SACPCMP designations:
* Construction Manager
* Construction Project Manager
* Construction Health and Safety Agent
* Construction Health and Safety officer
* Construction Mentor
* Professional Construction mentor.

The first four also have Candidate status options, but the draft regulation may well not specify whether a candidate agent could be appointed.

Lobby group DASH said the application for exemption, and thus for health and safety job reservation, was premature, since the legality of construction professional registration was still restricted to the state, via the Department of Public works.

Promulgation of the Construction Regulations by the Department of Labour in October or November 2013, may enforce registration of built environment professionals for the first time.

Comment on Construction Regulations 2013 refused

“We were in discussions with DOL to make registration of health and safety professionals specific to the SACPCMP”, said DASH administrator Rudy Maritz. “However DOL has responded via Tibor Szana that the comment period was closed.

“DOL also said that The Advisory Council for Occupational Health and Safety (ACOHS) and the Chief Inspector will sign off on the document for presentation to the Minister, and will not circulate a copy of the Draft Construction Regulations prior to promulgation.

“We asked the Competition Commission to investigate the matter further, as a similar situation is arising with voluntary associations using their SAQA recognition as registrars to punt for membership, and asking employers to specify their designations conditions of employment.

“It has even been publicly advocated as a legal requirement to register in terms of SAQA requirements. It is clear that some professional bodies do not understand the purpose of their SAQA recognition.”

DASH advised the commission to “tread carefully as any decisions you make, may be against the Constitution.”

• For background, or to comment via DASH lobby group, visit http://dashforum.wordpress.com/2013/08/31/professional-registration-may-not-be-needed/

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
The following two tabs change content below.
Sheqafrica.com is Africa's largest independent SHEQ Magazine, hosting over 2 000 articles and news items since 2007. Sheqafrica.com is owned by the Cygma Group, a global provider of risk management and compliance solutions. Sheqafrica.com is registered as a digital publication with the ISSN.
Share

4 thoughts on “Construction professions applied for health and safety job reservation

  1. If we look at this from a positive view point, it only means that safety officers with less than the required competencies set by the SACPCMP will soon be removed from the construction sector. Clearly this was the intention from the beginning, to perform legal cleansing of the construction sector due to its poor safety track record. It also indicates the tertiary qualified professionals are driving this further to create a proper profession.

    In terms of the interpretation of the regulations in the article published by DASH from the link you provided, the regulations are extremely ambiguous. The question now remains – how long will construction clients and contractors have to get this in place?

    Another thing, which I do believe ACOSH overlooked, is the implications of the NEMA on the “construction permit” system, if this is still on the cards. According to NEMA, a EIA is required for any activity which requires a permit in terms of any other Act of parliament. Well done! Now even the Environmental Consultants will reap the financial rewards and the large projects will be further delayed.

  2. Confusing, but I hope that a simple streamlined format or road map emerges, and that the best outcome for the industry prevails.

  3. Sadley it appears from this article that ACHASM has had no input into the health and safety professional registration launch, however you are 100% correct Peter Shields, it is a “legal cleansing of the construction sector”.

    1. Kim, I do believe that ACHASM was instrumental in shaping the OHS professionalisation process, via Anton Krause and Prof John Smallwood. I also know that both were among the first to be registered by SACPCMP. However, I doubt if their inputs have been considered by ACOSH when they advised the DOL on the context of the Construction Regulations Amendment.
      In fact, I am of the opinion that the Regulations deliberately left open a back door for SAIOSH, the only professional body with representation on ACOSH. I see this as conflict of interest.

Comments are closed.

close
Facebook IconLinkedInLinkedInLinkedIn
error: Contact the Cygma Group for Copyright licence.